
Biography
Sean focuses his practice on complex insurance defense litigation from pre-suit investigations through trial. Sean is a seasoned attorney with over twenty-three years of experience as a practicing attorney with dual admission and having practiced law in both the State of Connecticut and New York State. Throughout his career, Sean has demonstrated a strong ability to manage high-volume caseloads and navigate intricate legal matters. He has extensive trial experience, having secured multiple jury and bench trial verdicts in high-exposure cases. In addition to courtroom success, Sean has resolved numerous disputes through binding arbitration and mediation, showcasing his versatility across litigation and alternative dispute resolution.
Sean began his legal career with Long Island-based insurance defense and medical malpractice defense firms, serving clients in New York City and Long Island. He later spent 18 years as a litigator for a Fortune 100 global insurer, handling complex personal injury cases. Frequently called upon to take over litigation on the eve of trial, Sean was trusted to manage matters involving elevated risk and complexity. His ability to build strong relationships with clients and internal stakeholders has been a hallmark of his professional success.
Beyond his legal practice, Sean enjoys spending time with his wife and son, following Fairfield University basketball, and coaching youth sports, including Little League baseball. A passionate sports enthusiast, he has a particular interest in Major League Baseball and NFL football.
Education
Hofstra University School of Law, J.D., 2002
Fairfield University, B.A., 1999
Honors
Pi Sigma Alpa: National Politics Honor Society
Trial Advocacy Program by National Institute for Trial Advocacy (NITA)
Representative Matters
Hine v. LM General Ins. Co. Plaintiff voluntarily withdrew complaint against UIM insurer after motion for summary judgment filed establishing UIM policy could not be triggered.
Milton v. Yopchik, Motions to dismiss apportionment complaint and amended complaint granted dismissing actions as against client due to violations of apportionment deadline, Connecticut General Statutes § 52-102b(a) and the applicable statute of limitations for negligence actions, General Statutes § 52-584.
Espinal-Espinal v Pena, Motion to strike counterclaims granted dismissing claims against client Plaintiff/Defendant on the counterclaim, as an unauthorized amendment of the answer adding a counterclaim only months prior to trial, prejudiced the client who would have to defend claims of negligent and recklessness conduct without the pertinent discovery.
Correia v. Nimmons, Motion for summary judgment granted where Plaintiff misidentified the defendant as a party involved in a motor vehicle accident.
Community
Sean is active in the PTA for his son's school and the Tashua Fathers Club.
Sean is a long time donor to both the American Cancer Society and Ronald Mcdonald House Charities.